Recently the Chronicle of Higher Education published an article written by an anonymous “hired gun” who writes admissions essays, term papers, and even doctoral theses for paying students, who in turn pass these off as their own. Bloomberg Businessweek also ran a similar piece that profiled a couple of similar services that write essays for business school applicants.
Are these services unethical? Yes, we think so, but that’s so obvious that we won’t devote any more words to it here. (If you’re reading this because you’re looking to hire someone to write your admissions essays for you, then you can keep looking.)
What really concerns us is that schools and admissions offices seemingly don’t question how someone with a horrible command or English could create a perfectly constructed essay or research paper. If you are to believe the sources quoted in both article, these services work well enough (i.e., students get caught rarely enough) that they have thriving businesses with repeat customers. Again, the students who submit these and the hired guns who write them are flaunting the rules of the system, but where the hell the admissions officers, professors, and university department heads who should easily catch this sort of behavior? You mean to tell me that, as a student with broken English clumsily defends a doctoral thesis that he’s barely read all the way through, the thought of, “I wonder if this is his work,” never crosses their minds?
Again, that doesn’t excuse such behavior, but we really wonder about who’s minding the shop at these supposedly academically challenging institutions. Just like the TSA may never catch every pen knife that goes through airport security, it’s understandable if a handful of forged academic papers slip through the system now and then. But, if the practice is as commonplace as the Chronicle piece makes it out to be (just look at the business this guy’s company supposedly does), then someone is not doing their job. This isn’t even a question of what the penalties should be for students who are caught cheating — those penalties should of course be steep — but a question of why more of these students don’t get caught in the first place.
Another concern of ours: It bothers us is that such services cause the whole industry of admissions consultants and coaches to get painted with the same broad brush. As mentioned in the Bloomberg Businessweek article, AIGAC is an international organization devoted to upholding ethical standards among admissions consultants. Bring admitted to AIGAC is no small task — a company and its individual members have to jump through many hoops to be admitted — and maintaining one’s membership is just as involved.
Although AIGAC now has dozens of members around the world, it takes just one or two bad actors (like the ones profiled in these articles) to cause some admissions officer to go off half-cocked and ban any type of application assistance, no matter what the circumstances. We’d hate to see that happen because of these services.
For more MBA admissions advice, be sure to subscribe to this blog and to follow us on Twitter!
Search This Blog
MBA Admissions Updates
MBA Game Plan on Twitter
My TweetsRecommended Resources
Previous Articles
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- January 2008
Browse Categories
- Admissions Consulting
- Admissions Interviews
- Admissions Research
- Admissions Trends
- Admissions Videos
- Anderson
- Applying to Business School
- AWA
- Babcock
- Berkeley
- Bloomberg
- Booth
- Business Ethics
- Business School
- Business School Rankings
- BusinessWeek
- Carnegie Mellon
- Chicago
- Chicago Booth
- Choosing a School
- Class Visits
- College
- Columbia
- Community Service
- Cornell
- Darden
- Dartmouth
- Deferred Admission
- Disabilities
- Duke
- Economy
- EMBA
- Entrepreneurship
- Financial Aid
- Forte Foundation
- Free Trial
- Fuqua
- GMAC
- GMAT
- GMAT Practice
- GRE
- Haas
- Harvard
- HBS
- HBS 2+2 Program
- In the Media
- INSEAD
- Integrated Reasoning
- International MBA
- iPhone
- JDMBA
- Johnson
- Kellogg
- Law School
- Law School Admissions
- Leadership
- London Business School
- LSAT
- MBA
- mba admissions
- MBA Admissions Blueprint
- MBA Admissions Research
- MBA Careers
- MBA Deadlines
- mba essays
- MBA Fairs
- MBA interview
- MBA Jobs
- MBA Oath
- MBA Rankings
- McCombs
- Michigan
- Military
- minority applicants
- MIT
- MIT Sloan
- New York
- NYU
- Part-Time MBA
- Pre-MBA Prep
- Rankings
- Recession
- Recommendations
- Ross
- Round 1
- Round Three
- Round Two
- Scholarships
- Sloan
- Social Entrepreneurship
- Specialized Programs
- Stanford
- Stern
- Student Loans
- Tepper
- Toigo
- Transcripts
- Tuck
- UCLA
- UNC Kenan-Flagler
- Uncategorized
- Undergraduate Business Schools
- UT Austin
- UVA
- Veritas Prep
- waitlist
- Wake Forest
- Webinar
- Wharton
- Women in Business
- Yale